The last couple of years have seen a dramatic rise in the promotion of alternative dispute resolution generally and mediation in particular by the English judiciary. The Court of Appeal in Churchill v. Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council[1] held that, contrary to popular belief, the courts had the power to order parties to mediate; the Civil Procedure Rules were duly amended to incorporate that power explicitly. And then, in DKH Retail Limited & Others v. City Football Group Limited[2], the court made the first compulsory mediation order.
Latest Articles
On the Record: Cooley Litigation Trends Webinar Series – Content and Safety Litigation
With online safety laws becoming prolific – and content moderation and child protection obligations at the forefront of this – how are we starting to see this sea-change play out in litigation? In this webinar session, we’ll explore related developments across the UK, EU and US.
Two Judgments on Forum Challenges
Two notable English court judgments on jurisdiction have been handed down in the last few months – the first being the Court of Appeal’s decision in Limbu & Others v. Dyson Technology Ltd & Others[1], and the second the High Court’s decision in da Silva & Others v. Brazil Iron Ltd & Another[2]. Both cases involved group litigation against UK-domiciled companies in respect of the actions of third parties overseas. In both cases, the defendants challenged the English courts’ jurisdiction on the grounds that the respective foreign courts were the more appropriate forum for the dispute. In both cases, the court rejected the challenge and retained jurisdiction. In Limbu, the Court of Appeal found, contrary to the conclusion of the High Court, that England was the more appropriate forum. In da Silva, however, the High Court found that Brazil was the more appropriate forum, but it nevertheless retained jurisdiction on the grounds that there was a real risk that the claimants would not obtain substantial justice in Brazil.
The Million-Pound Question (Revisited): Is My Contract Unfair?
The decision of the High Court of England and Wales in Durber v. PPB Entertainment Ltd is another helpful case study in how to host a consumer-facing website.[1] It is interesting, given how much time is spent carefully drafting the substance of terms and conditions, that the presentation of those same terms and conditions to consumers can sometimes be an afterthought. If companies do not get this right, there is a real risk that they may be providing consumers with the ammunition they need to argue that any relevant terms and conditions are unenforceable against them.
On the Record: Cooley Litigation Trends Webinar Series – Update on Key Issues in Crypto Disputes
Please join Cooley’s litigation team for the fourth session of our webinar series “Update on Key Issues in Crypto Disputes”
In this webinar we will delve into the evolving landscape of crypto disputes litigation in the UK and EU. As the adoption of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology continues to rise, so do the legal challenges and disputes associated with them. This webinar is designed for legal professionals, financial institutions, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of crypto-related litigation.
On the Record: Cooley Litigation Trends Webinar Series – A Guide to UK Litigation for US Lawyers
Please join Cooley’s litigation team for the third session of our continuing legal education (CLE) webinar series where we explore trends and insights on the disputes landscape in the UK and mainland Europe, and the issues that drive them.
The UK Arbitration Bill Becomes an Act: Key Changes
On 24 February 2025, the UK Arbitration Act 2025 received royal assent. While it does not bring with it large-scale reform of the Arbitration Act 1996 (which was considered to be largely fit for purpose), some of the amendments are nevertheless significant. The following are of particular note.
Money Laundering: The UK Supreme Court’s Decision in El-Khouri Changes Scope of Extraterritoriality Under POCA
In the recent judgment in El-Khouri v. Government of the United States of America,[1] a case concerning the operation of the double criminality rule in the context of extradition, the UK Supreme Court made a seminal ruling on the extraterritorial limits of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA).
Court of Appeal Split on Scope of Exclusion Clause
In EE Ltd v. Virgin Mobile Telecoms Ltd[1], the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court’s decision that EE’s claim against Virgin was excluded under the terms of the parties’ telecommunications supply agreement.[2] While the decision ultimately confirmed the reasoning of the lower court, the decision is notable for being surprisingly close.
UK Online Safety Act: Age Assurance and Children’s Access Statement
On 16 January 2025, the UK Office of Communications (Ofcom) published its Statement on Age Assurance and Children’s Access, and officially commenced the process for user-to-user and search services (“Service Providers”) to conduct a children’s access assessment and implement robust age checks based on Ofcom’s published guidance. For completeness, we note that Ofcom also has published separate guidance on robust age checks for platforms that allow, display or publish their own pornographic content, but this is not considered further below.